On 8 Jun, 15:03, "Frank's"
wrote:
Can you show me how you define gravity as a theory that was taught in
Florida?
I think that would be a good example for me to follow.
Any other comments from other members as how I can satisfy the
learning problems
of this person? A discussion regarding gravity by those who know
something about it
would be enlightning. I would like to know when a theory becomes a law
as an
amateur radio operator sees it.
Richard asks for no over elabaration.
One liners please and try to follow his example.
Some body could also what materials can be turned into gold
(With references ofcourse)with definition of words and sources used.
I know you have to assume that others have some intelligence.
Most know how to change a light bulb on a tower as they have had
that experience over and over in their respective tower maintenance
careers.

The word "Theory" has several meanings, and should not be taken
out of context. As examples fromwww.dictionary.com:
1.. A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts
or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely
accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
2.. contemplation or speculation.
Many theories at taken to mean "2", when "1" should be used.
The theory of gravitation falls into the first class, stated as follows:
"Every object attracts every other object with a force proportional
to the masses of the objects, and inversely proportional to the
square of the distance between the objects".

--
Frank- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh my. Gravity, theory and equilibrium is way to much to foist on
amateur radio operators. Most are so old and have little time
to sleep or live that they wouldn't be around at the end even
if we could get there because of constant opposition to the use
of the words.
I thimk Frank, a start on another attenna aproach such as the
concentration of time and computor work by Cebik and Antennex
in efforts to get an antenna that can be matched over a wide band.
I don't think they got anywhere but maybe a review would be in order
of making the driven element really thick which they say is the way to
go.
Maybe making the driven element thicker than the length of the element
is the way to go to prove this concept that they are trying to prove.
Perhaps the old timers can give us hints about a similar aproach that
they invented years ago that nobody took notice of. After all every
thing is really known except how to put a PL259 connector
on a coax that hasbeen ill treated by being stepped on.
I will have to rethink all this after I have found out what
Paris Hilton would say.