Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:
I doubt that you've ever accidentally omitted an adjective in your
life.
Of course, I don't consider myself to be omniscient. The
difference between you and me is that you put your faith
in science while I am skeptical of virtually everything.
IMO, Newton's laws of physics were proved wrong and their
application had to be limited as a result. If Newton had
been informed about seconds getting longer and mass
increasing as velocity is increased, he no doubt would
have rejected such as complete nonsense.
Is a ruler calibrated to 1/32 of an inch wrong compared to a
micrometer calibrated to .0005 inch?
Is the micrometer wrong compared to an optical inferometer?
Must one use an optical inferometer to build a one hole outhouse?
Again, how do you explain the fact that entangled particles
violate the theory that nothing can happen faster than the
speed of light? Oh yeah, I forgot - simply re-define the
problem out of existence. Those particles are communicating
faster than light but there is no information flow (yet).
A nonsense question.
There is a big difference between "something happening" and
mass moving, but you know that, don't you?
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.