Cecil Moore wrote in news:ZIXbi.29511$JZ3.3334
@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net:

Jim Higgins wrote:
Do you understand Darwin's Theory of Evolution?

In a nutshell, random mutations followed by survival
of the fittest. But now man can cause non-random
mutations followed by guaranteed survival of whatever
species we create no matter how unfit they might be.
Man has evolved to the point of being able to violate
the theory of evolution.

Just applying a different sort of evolution. If the pressure comes from
humans, it is the same as pressure from radiation, environmental
pressure, or simple random mutation. If man keeps life forms around that
have genetic traits that would prove fatal in another environment, it
just means that those traits are not fatal at this point. If things
change, they could become a detriment, and the more red in tooth and claw
version of evolution would take over.


What exactly is your apparent issue with this?

All N versions of string theory cannot be correct.
Yet someone implied that "scientific theories"
wrap aroung subsets of theories that essentially
are so scientifically well designed that they cannot
be wrong.

Wow, who said that, Cecil?. They would be quite wrong.

Now if you were referring to my "evolution and all the other things
we observe correlation that I mentioned a little while back, then that
would be bit of a disservice on your part. A whole lot of observations do
a fine job of propping up evolution.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -