On 14 Jun, 09:37, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:35:39 -0700, art wrote:
On 13 Jun, 23:01, Richard Clark wrote:
... tsk, tsk, tsk. Such a fall from grace for the fractal antenna.
Gone, and long forgotten.
That was another antenna that amateurs tried to remove from the
face of the earth because it provided a new aproach to antennas.

Hi Arthur,

Your soap box would carry more weight if you actually contributed to
the design.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

My point is that it is not "gone and long forgotten" despite
the venom from you and Roy in you attempts to devalue the idea.
Here we are twenty years on and the antenna survives as a
new technology. Just shows that you can't stop science when
the shrill of your voices runs out of puff. Fractal antennas
are now in the books signifying that the efforts of you and Roy
was all for naught and could not overcome the test of time.
Now your efforts are concentrated anew where again you will fail
despite the shrillness of your wailing. Ideas are for the books
and your venom doesn't count for inclusion.