Jim Higgins wrote:
I'd say your postulate is flawed because you don't maintain a constant
frame of reference.

No, I'm saying maintaining a constant frame of reference
is impossible because all possible frames of reference
are constantly changing.

Those observations are not made from the same frame
of reference and cannot be directly compared.

My point exactly. Why does man continue to ignorantly
attempt the impossible?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com