On Jun 16, 1:19 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
It usually turns out that he used the one which allows whatever he
said to be true in some context.

You are the pot calling the kettle black, Jim.
Your narrow definitions from the field of physics
are not even accepted within the RF engineering
community.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Hi Cecil -

I am not in the business of defining physical phenomena. I do
occasionally refer to the definitions published in physics books
though. From my perspective, these definitions are uniformly
consistent with those used in engineering. In any instance where you
find them to differ, I would like to suggest that a re-examination of
your understanding of the phenomena might help resolve those
differences.

73, Jim AC6XG