View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old June 21st 07, 01:01 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
[email protected] Mark@k4yz.org is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 156
Default why can't Mark act like he is normal for once. Dloyd I'll answer that one Becuase I am not normal and I thank god for it daily

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:56:36 -0700, Dloyd Lavies
wrote:

On Jun 20, 4:17?pm, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:18:33 -0700, Dloyd Lavies





wrote:
On Jun 20, 12:14?pm, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:45:52 -0700, Dloyd Lavies


wrote:
On Jun 19, 10:37?pm, wrote:
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/2007/06/m...tion-with.html


that is hteh gist of Dloyd is asserting that if someone places say an
ads in my name (or caitlyn in this case) that the perosns whoose name
is being falsely used is somehow respoble the criminal action of a
party or indeed parties unkown


Indeed If as has been threatened ads wil l palced in my name or
sactions with a check arriving in my mail box the money legaly is MINE
the sender has been vitumized but not by me


the sdame thing applies to Caitlyn the victum of being accused of
being transgendered (i do not know or care wether is the case)


"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams


woger you are a Congress all in your own head


http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/


G


--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com


"bruning through Dloyds jamming why do you claim recieveing a check in
the maile is a crime asshole?"


I never said receiving it was a crime.


you certainly did imply that and you go on to state in this post


What's wrong Mark, can't you
read English. Nevertheless, it is a crime to keep the check and cash
it, retard.


nope, or more accurately it is not a crime for the reciever to keep
and cash it it is crime but the criminal is the one that placed the
flase ad or uction not the one set up to receive the proceeds, unless
it can be proven the receiver KNOWS the chceck ill gotten


IYO, is it a crime or not?, fyou say "nope, or more accurately it is
not a crime for the reciever to keep and cash it it is crime. First
you say "nope" then you say it is a crime. Make up your twisted mind.


all is coorect in Contest Dloyd



Nevetheless, most normal people know if they start receiving checks
from people they don't know for no reason, something is awry......


awry sure

......., and know
better then to cash the check, and that is the way the law views it as
after the fact, and apparantly LE and the prosecuters in Wisconsin see


no it is not apeerant that they see it that if they did they would nt
be engaged in serious pleabargaining of 5 felony counts to one
misdomeneaor

it that way. So we will see what the court decides,


no you are not wating for that court you are ruling FOR court (which
is a bad aidea if you ever get in front of a judge BTW they tend not
to like that

I am not ruling for the court.


sure you are
I never said anyone was guilty of
anything,



sure you did

but the law is clear on receiving funds that do not belong
to you,........


ana another ruling you have ruled a person may not lawfully recieve
money from strangers


....... it is against the law no matter what the receiving party
believe's.


you are claiming in this particular case that it is crime for the
recieving to who had made interapeals for fincail aid in crisis to
assume that the money that arived in her mailbox was not upposed to be
there

Common sense does come in to play.


common sense and th e aw rarely meet anymore Dloyd if you had REAL
knowledge youd know that

I have no comment on
whether the DA is bargining the case. However, I do know that the
case originally was a misdemeanor, but was changed to a Felony H, I
find it hard to believe that they would bargin back down.


again you porve you have little knowledge fo real LE Dloyd



I have indulged you I don't supose you would Indulge ME by answering
why you seem to have Delusion I want to be "normal" ? that has NEVER
(except for a monets of weakness) been an ambition of mine.

Aspire to far more than that, and I have to guts to go for it

If I end up looking like Don Quoxte (soory that may be mispelled)from
tiem to time that is the price of aspiring to greatess

when I die dloyd it will be after having lived my life in something
otrher than an endless fear of dying, that at leats will give
something in comon with great Men. Like Ceaser Alexander Napeolen
Hitler, Satlin Moes and the young rabbi from Judea

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com