On Jun 22, 3:47 am, wrote:
On Jun 22, 12:04 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:





"RHF" wrote in message

oups.com...

Phasing in and Increase of the Digital Signal over
Time would ease the Transition toHD Radio.
First Year 1% Digital
Second Year 2% Digital
Third Year 4% Digital
Fourth Year 8% Digital
Fifth Year 16% Digital
A 16% Digital Signal should give aHD Radio
Station a Signal Coverage Area far better then
their present Analog Signal Coverage Area.

Based on actually working with 40 or so HD stations, the current HD signal,
on AM, covers to at least the same usable and used coverage area the analog
signal reaches, sometimes more. On FM, it also reaches the same area where
nearly all actual listening happens.


- "HD Radio's Dirty Little Secret"
-
- "Nope, the dirty little secret is that HD Radio's coverage
- is far less than regular analog radio.
-
- About 60% of analog radio's reach even."
-
- http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/hd...le-secret.html

ibocisacr - Good Info and Link.

"HD Radio's Dirty Little Secret"

http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/hd...e-secret.html-
Hide quoted

QUOTE - "This is really very discouraging and is leading us to wonder
why we should bother to promote HD. To do so will only disappoint,
and, perhaps, antagonize a significant segment of the audience who
finds that the system doesn't deliver."

- - - i would agree -and- my ears don't lie ~ RHF