View Single Post
  #93   Report Post  
Old June 23rd 07, 03:44 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John Smith I John Smith I is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Guy from university physics ... Eureka! A picture!

wrote:

...


Well, it appears to me, the shortened 10 meter 1/2 is superior to a 1/4
(both mounted mobile) and the shortened 1/2 is VERY close in performance
to a full ~17 ft. (vs. ~5.3 ft. shortened--with the top hat and spacings
optimized, the difference is less than the width of a meter needle.)

This silly combination of know "tricks" is certainly doing something
which common place formulas/equations don't account for ...

However, if you already naysay on the navy data, I won't be able to
present any proof which even comes close--my equipment budget doesn't
even begin to match that of the navys' to begin with ...

Too bad a bunch of different people don't use a standard test jig, apply
their own modifications and generate a ton of data/results ...

Regards,
JS