"art" wrote in message
ups.com...
On 22 Jun, 11:57, "Dave" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

oups.com...





On 21 Jun, 14:11, "Richard Fry" wrote:
Art wrote about "Gaussian antenna in planar form" Newsgroup members,
Thought I would give you another example to laugh at.
(etc)

___________

ART: Probably some of your readers are hoping for your
posts in plainer form, so they might hope to understand
what you mean.

RF
I am sharing my findings that are not declared in any books.
I did my best. I have answered all questions at least once.
In the archives are the mathematical details, samples of antennas,
independent computor program checking, independent mathematical
explanations and every stage of the transition from Gaussian
law of Statics,conservative field to a non concervative field.
An explanation of the clustered elements being in equilibrium
by virtue of all current directions change at the same time.
That the Gaussian array is resonant in its entirety as well
as each element alone. Yes, if you want to gamble you can follow
the two Richards line and say it is a fake or if you are
capable in basic science you can tackle it yourself and not have to
resort to the postings of the two Richards, both of which
state they don't understand it so what use are their comments.
If you are of the opinion that you cannot add the same factor
to both sides of a mathematical equation as in simple algebra
as David has said time and time again then don't even try to
understand the rest.

Art KB9MZ...XG

the real problem is that art is using a software program that makes
proper
use of coupling between elements that he doesn't understand. he has come
up
with some odd parasitic array that doesn't look like a yagi for some
reason,
and came up with some off the wall theory about why it works. he grabbed
a
few buzzwords and put together a mantra and he is sticking with it. he
has
admitted he doesn't have an ee background and yet he is trying to
convince
those of us that do that we can't possibly understand what he has
created,
even if he can't put together a coherent explanation of it in proper em
terms. its nothing magic, its just another form of a parasitic array
that
happens to do something that he thinks is interesting for some reason.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I volunteered not admitted that I am a mechanical, but even
mechanical engineers are aware of what it takes to change
a conservative field into a nonconservative field. You SAY
you are a EE, well I don't believe you!
Your comments so far deny the very possibility. You are not aware
of electrical fields ala conservative fields as in a static field
and a non conservative field as in a time variable electromagnetic
fields, you cannot possibly be a EE. It would appear that only
non EE's have ventured forward to deny the underpinnings where-
as those that obviously have a E.E. have not denied the mathematics,
or the program results e.t.c. .If one had a degree, any sort of
a degree, he would have presented data that demonstrated the faults
of my position. The E.E.,s on this group of which there are many
have not done this or even mildly echoed your position.
You sir are not now in a position to call yourself an electrical
engineer and your postings thoroughly confirm that you are a fraud.
Art KB9MZ.....XG

you have not presented any facts to rebut. start with one fact, define
'gaussian antenna'.