On 22 Jun, 11:57, "Dave" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

oups.com...





On 21 Jun, 14:11, "Richard Fry" wrote:
Art wrote about "Gaussian antenna in planar form" Newsgroup members,
Thought I would give you another example to laugh at.
(etc)

___________

ART: Probably some of your readers are hoping for your
posts in plainer form, so they might hope to understand
what you mean.

RF
I am sharing my findings that are not declared in any books.
I did my best. I have answered all questions at least once.
In the archives are the mathematical details, samples of antennas,
independent computor program checking, independent mathematical
explanations and every stage of the transition from Gaussian
law of Statics,conservative field to a non concervative field.
An explanation of the clustered elements being in equilibrium
by virtue of all current directions change at the same time.
That the Gaussian array is resonant in its entirety as well
as each element alone. Yes, if you want to gamble you can follow
the two Richards line and say it is a fake or if you are
capable in basic science you can tackle it yourself and not have to
resort to the postings of the two Richards, both of which
state they don't understand it so what use are their comments.
If you are of the opinion that you cannot add the same factor
to both sides of a mathematical equation as in simple algebra
as David has said time and time again then don't even try to
understand the rest.

Art KB9MZ...XG

the real problem is that art is using a software program that makes proper
use of coupling between elements that he doesn't understand. he has come up
with some odd parasitic array that doesn't look like a yagi for some reason,
and came up with some off the wall theory about why it works. he grabbed a
few buzzwords and put together a mantra and he is sticking with it. he has
admitted he doesn't have an ee background and yet he is trying to convince
those of us that do that we can't possibly understand what he has created,
even if he can't put together a coherent explanation of it in proper em
terms. its nothing magic, its just another form of a parasitic array that
happens to do something that he thinks is interesting for some reason.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It is not my problem that you can't understand it I suggest you
consult
an engineer for help.As I have said many times before the antenna
array
is resonant in its entirety as is the contributing radiating elements.
That definition therefore is describing an array in equilibrium.
From that definition it is obvious that there is no coupling as with
a Yagi design i.e. it is NOT a parassitic array and you are not an
engineer,
you are a fraud.By the way I volunteered that I was a mechanical
engineer,
I wasn't tortured or any thing like that so I would "admit" it. But
even
mechanical engineers understand conservative and non conservative
fields
and what is required to transform from one to another by adding the
varient
time factor ( see mathematical analysis by DrJohn E Davis of M.I.T.
in the
Gaussian Static Law thread dated March 13.} While you are at it see
the
independent antenna program check by Frank Dated May 4 in thread
Gaussian
Cluster Antenna Array Data General viewers should also insert the word
Gaussian
as the key search word above to read reactions by the many esteemed
experts
in this antenna group which will amaze you
With all this information you still cling to the silly idea that you
are
a E.E. when obviously you are just a fraud. Find yourself a real
engineer
to agree with you first before you make an idiot of yourself again
Art KB9MZ......XG