On Jun 24, 6:02 pm, art wrote:


Not one has delved into why the mathematics of a non concervative
field
when a time varying current is applied provide the same results that
Maxwell
determined without the use of the expanded Gaussian law.

I thought an idea had to be proven before you could call it a "law"...
I would think this would also apply if you were to pervert an existing
law, and call it an "expanded" law..
What steps have to taken to prove this idea? Any at all?
Myself, I see this as a straw grasp of immense proportions..
As I remember, this Dr. Davis came along for a while, but it seems
to me once he got a grip on what you were proposing, he ran away
like a teenager "wahooing" beer from a 7-11 store..
MK