On 24 Jun, 18:08, wrote:
On Jun 24, 6:02 pm, art wrote:



Not one has delved into why the mathematics of a non concervative
field
when a time varying current is applied provide the same results that
Maxwell
determined without the use of the expanded Gaussian law.

I thought an idea had to be proven before you could call it a "law"...
I would think this would also apply if you were to pervert an existing
law, and call it an "expanded" law..
What steps have to taken to prove this idea? Any at all?
Myself, I see this as a straw grasp of immense proportions..
As I remember, this Dr. Davis came along for a while, but it seems
to me once he got a grip on what you were proposing, he ran away
like a teenager "wahooing" beer from a 7-11 store..
MK

No that is not true. After trying several times to educate the group
and getting responses such as yours he decided to move on as
other experts have done in the past. They are trying to help with the
amateur radio antenna group but realised quite quickly it was
mainly composed of the non antenna type people. They don't need
the sort of things that are stated they move on. He has a Doctorate
and thus he is qualified for some respect