snip

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard,
I have read your letter several times.
Even parts that I considered not pertinent
to the subject at hand since a lot of it
is just opinion some of which I disagree.
However it would appear to be the beginnings
of a debate in an area that others are
uncomfortable and for that I thank you
The following provides the crux of the debate.

'The "law" used to prove a concept, was in fact,
Maxwells extension of statics to the time domain'

I have no problem with that statement so it
provides an ideal starting point.
My understanding is that Maxwell had a host
of theorems by many scientists from which
to draw information from, many of which
gave the connection of the statics to
time domain aproach.

I am not aware of any evidence that he drew on Gauss
for this since Gauss had not provided this extension.
Can you supply me a source that verifies this fact?

We then come to a very important question with regard
to my patent request.
Since you say it has already been invented this
inferres that you are aware of a source where the
transition from Gauss was documented as the foundation
of a new antenna design. This surely will put my
submission back to the dark ages.
Would you care to share this with the group?

Thus from the above you will see that curtailed
the length of this post to two questions only
so differences cannot be skirted unless intended
Regards
Art