View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old June 25th 07, 03:26 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Roadie Roadie is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 290
Default Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103

On Jun 25, 9:41 am, Duncan wrote:
On 25 Jun, 14:07, Roadie wrote:





On Jun 25, 8:43 am, Duncan wrote:


On 13 Jun, 21:50, Roadie wrote:


On Jun 13, 1:48 am, wrote:


Duncan Ross (from Scotland) wrote a very entertaining comparison of
theDE1121and DE1103:http://simart.googlepages.com/de1121de1103.htm


Worth a read!


--
Art Simon
/artsimon


Thanks for posting. After reading it I'm at a complete loss as to why
the author chose theDE1121over the DE1103 unless he was looking for
a way to satisfy "masochistic tendencies".


Hi Roadie!


I chose the DE1121 because on a crowded band like 49m it outperforms
the DE1103, makes unattended recordings and the RDS-esque way that
station names appear as you tune into them while browsing regardless
of band is a sockdologer.


And I'm a masochist.


And according to your writeup, that explains it.


Best regards,


Duncan


Don't knock it until you've tried it! (both sentences) :^D

D.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I have tried your writeup. And I remain puzzled by your conclusions.