On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:57:32 -0700, art wrote:

'The "law" used to prove a concept, was in fact,
Maxwells extension of statics to the time domain'

Arthur,

I have no problem with that statement so it
provides an ideal starting point.
There are accepted convention in faithfully quoting a document you are
immediately responding to. To take my words and re-arrange them to
suit your own way of understanding is NOT a quote from me.

My understanding is that Maxwell had a host
of theorems by many scientists from which
to draw information from, many of which
gave the connection of the statics to
time domain aproach.

I am not aware of any evidence that he drew on Gauss
for this since Gauss had not provided this extension.
Can you supply me a source that verifies this fact?

You mean like he NAMED one of his laws after Gauss? Doesn't that give
you a clue? Dr. D. already supplied the source, I responded to it and
corrected Dr. D's error of attribution.

Read the source we BOTH refer to. It has been offered to you by us
BOTH.

We then come to a very important question with regard
to my patent request.
Since you say it has already been invented

Show my statement, in my own words, quoted in the accepted convention
from the exact source (in other words, highlight the statement in the
original posting I made, and post that here).

If you cannot perform the minimum practices of quoting, then there's
nothing more to be said.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC