On 26 Jun, 13:34, John Smith I wrote:
Buck wrote:

...

The section below with pictures made a difference. I saw that the
patent is in concept, that is the arrangement of the coils for the
desired effect and the design of coils which can be helical, squared
off, etc.

Thanks.

Buck

Buck:

Yeah, all that alright.

However, he also claims the "arrangement" he has increases the impedance
of the 1/4 wave shortened antenna to 72-100 ohms. This is interesting
in and of itself, shortened antennas tend to have impedances in the
single digits and are difficult to match efficiently ...

I am just beginning to toy with this version, maybe can get serious this
weekend ...

Regards,
JS

What Buck has stated as well as what the inventor has stated
is in full agreement to what I have always stated and proved.
"The radiator can be any shape or size or angle etc.as long as
it is in equilibrium and resonant which is buried in the laws
of the masters" The question of apurture is purely a reflection
of efficiency which when included in a closed circle shows that
vividly with repect to enclosed area. The same antenna arrangement
is a reflection of Gaussian law and as such can be removed
from any ground assumptions that is inferred by those who have
done this and done that. That same element can be duplicated
to form a dipole of any shape to remove the inefficiencies of
ground and can even be multiplied in number to form an array in
accordance with the Gaussian antenna. It all comes down to actually
understanding the underpinnings of the formation of radiation
rather than learned laws where one is not interested in advancing
for the good of science. Once upon a time I saw an experiment formed
where a bunch of coils placed on a paper plate was placed on top of a
car
where radiation lit a fluerescent lamp..........same buried law.
And then we come to the fractal antenna...........same buried law
of which the mathematics given thoroughly proves tho rejected by ham
radio.
I know you can smell it.
Art Unwin KB9MZ......XG