On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:50:31 -0700, Telspam Electronics
wrote in
. com:

On Jul 5, 2:14 pm, " Peter" wrote:
If your critics offer you their money, so they can offend
themselves with your product... take it and lol all the way
to the bank.
Regards,
Peter.

Peter,
You can bet Frank knows the device works if he's willing to shell out
his hard earned money for it... no matter what he says here.


Brian, I have -never- said the thing didn't work. I -did- say that
your claims of what it can do are impossible. I can't wait to hook it
up to the radio and watch the modulation meter dance as I talk,
contrary to your claim that I will maintain 100% modulation 100% of
the time. It will be fun to hook it up to the distortion analyzer and
graph what you claim is less than 1% THD. I might even make a .wav of
my own voice, processed by your gizmo, as it's heard by the receiver.

But the most fun will come when I post the results and watch you try
and shovel a large pile of techno-turds trying to defend against how
your box -really- works.


I just find it comical that he blatently says one thing and then does
another. I guess he figures nobody will notice... lol


On the contrary, I hope EVERYONE will notice.... "lol".


And the sad part is... they might not out here on this group!


Thanks for the tip, Brian -- I think I'll post the results to a web
page as well, along with one of my favorite quotes from you:

"Now how did I know that Frank wouldn't have any ideas...
I guess he's too busy working on his Master's degree... LOL !"


BTW, where's that schematic?