On Jul 8, 2:15 pm, wrote:
On Jul 8, 7:10?pm, RHF wrote:





On Jul 8, 7:34 am, wrote:

On Jul 8, 10:20?am, "Spin" wrote:

With the majority of am bcb & sw stations going digital within four years,
why purchase a receiver that presently receives analog transmissions?

"HD Radio is a Farce !"

http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com/

IBOCISCRAZY,

"HD" FM {Digital} Radio using IBOC works and is a
significant improvement over Analog FM Radio and
makes $ense.

However, the "HD" AM/MW {Digital} Radio using IBOC
does not work and is a questionable enterprise using
the current AM/MW Band Plan.

and that's the way i hear it on my 'hd' radio ~ RHF
.
.
. .

Dumb **** - consumers do not have a problem with their analog radios
and could careless about digital radio around the world - you and a
handful of radio-geeks are the only ones who care. Sales of HD radios
are about zero ! Analog AM/FM works fine and adding more channels of
the same repetitive dribble is a joke !

"Can Sony Make HD Radio A Winner?"

"So, the old don't want HD. Young consumers think the concept is
laughable. Big retailers can't sell it. And radio companies won't
invest in it."

http://blogspot.com/2007/05/can-sony...io-winner.html

Lot-of-luck, HDshill!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

IBOC-IS-CRAZY,

Let me put it into simple Language that you can
understand :

First - "HD" FM {Digital} Radio using IBOC = Good.
* Why - "HD" FM {Digital} Radio using IBOC works and
is a significant improvement over Analog FM Radio and
makes $ense for the FM Radio Broadcaster and the
FM Radio Listener.

Second - "HD" AM/MW {Digital} Radio using IBOC = Questionable
* Why - "HD" AM/MW {Digital} Radio using IBOC does
not work nation wide and is a questionable Business
Enterprise using the current AM/MW Band Plan.

TBL - "HD" Radio using the IBOC Technology will
succeed or Fail based on the acceptance and use
of FM "HD" Radios - with AM/MW Radio as a go
along -or- not.

and that's the way i hear it on my 'hd' radio ~ RHF