Hey, I'm just learning and absorbing so anything new is a place for me to
start. Thanks again!
woody

"Owen Duffy" wrote in message
...
"Woody" wrote in news:hYdli.29709$BT3.8034@trnddc06:

Hi Owen. 5% was just a number picked out at random by me for
clarification of my question.
So you wouldn't want to share your 'sweet' findings, would you??
thanks!

I had a dig around through a few thousand spreadsheets... and found it.

9.05m, 12.6m, 18.3m, 26.4m, 33.3m, 44.9m.

If you want to cover 60m, leave the 26.4 out of the list.

Did someone mention 60' (18.3m), it is in the list, but it is more
critical than 26.4 or 12.6.

As noted in my earlier post, if you want to be 10% or more away from n
half waves on all bands, there is no solution.

These calcs don't consider proximity of objects that may shift the
tuning.

My advice still stands that the higher order parallel resonances aren't
such an issue, so this method unnecessarily constrains the solution..

Owen