View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old July 17th 07, 04:35 PM posted to rec.audio.tech,sci.astro,sci.physics,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.space
[email protected] jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default George Dishman says Karl Uppiano is wrong about AM radio, carrier-frequencies, and aliasing. Who should I believe? Why?

In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Paul Schlyter wrote:
In article ,
wrote:


search for AM modulation


You don't need to write "AM modulation", since "AM" means
"amplitude modulation". Therefore "AM modulation" becomes
"amplitude modulation modulation" ...... :-)


But perhaps you were considering adding some subcarrier to the AM? :-)))))))))


No, I was considering the fact that "am" is a common english word and
adding "modulation" to the search disambiguates the search.

Google AM:

1,680,000,000 hits starting with "I Am Bored - Sites for when you're bored."

Google AM modulation

16,200,000 hits

Google AM modulation equation

1,940,000 hits

It's called narrowing the search.

Or didn't you bother to read the part about "done a Google for" before
you started spouting?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.