View Single Post
  #31   Report Post  
Old July 20th 07, 03:36 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
Dana Dana is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
Default A more rational approach -- how I would like to changethecell phone industry.


"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 19, 8:44 pm, "Dana" wrote:
"Don Bowey" wrote in message

...





On 7/19/07 6:59 PM, in article
,
"Dana" wrote:


"Don Bowey" wrote in message
...
On 7/19/07 4:41 PM, in article
,
"John Navas" wrote:


On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:56:57 -0500, wrote
in
:


How about just national enforcing Californias proposed Consumer code
for cell phone companies.


Really bad idea. The market works better without government
interference.


Brilliant stupid canned comment.


California has a government.


The US has a government.


I'd rather we work issues with our elected Federal representatives
than
have
California start pushing at the state level.


States are more responsive than the feds, Besides we are a federal
republic,
hence the states should be taking back what the feds have grabbed.


Naïve point of view.


Not at all, and accurate statement reflecting current affairs with our
federal republic.

The feds grabbed?


Yep, common knowledge

Do you recall how the state's
representatives become feds?


It is a mistake having popular elections for the state Senators. Kind of
destroys the purpose of the Senate.



- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Yep - The US Senators should be 'appointed' by the
King of the State {Oops Governor} cause their should
represent the Big {Money} People.

And you think that the representatives and senators now publicly elected
represent the people. Come on, why do you think there are so many lobbyists
in D.C.

the divine right of money & the golden rule :
those with the gold make the rules ~ RHF