On Aug 7, 8:52 pm, "Jerry" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Aug 6, 6:41 am, D Peter Maus wrote:
Frank Halaburak wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
dxAce wrote:
dxAce wrote:
Not long from now, it will be Monday morning, August 6 in Hiroshima,
Japan.
Let's pause, and remember the time when men were men, and the sheep
knew their
place. A time when we actually gave our enemies the thumping they so
thoroughly
deserved, without endlessly whining about it.
Yes, it will soon be the 62nd Anniversary of the Atomic bombing of
Hiroshima.
And, I'm certain it will be mentioned on shortwave, so keep your
radio
on.
Radio Japan, 6145, coming in very well here via The 'Stan at 0000
GMT, 6
August
2007.
Initial news seemed to contain hand-wringing, whining, and as usual,
failure to take
responsibility.
And later programming also seems to try to deflect responsibility for
their actions,
and to place blame elsewhere.
All talk now is of PEACE! Where was their PEACE on December 7, 1941?
Typical of the Japs. And then some cockbite American comes on, talking
about how many
Japanese lives were affected? Give me a break! How many American lives
were affected
by the slant eyed **** throughout the entire war?
In my 41 or 42 years of SWL'ing, nothing has changed.
More **** from Japan.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
The dropping of the bomb saved millions of American and Jap lives
because it saved Japan from being invaded.Funny, they didn't mention
that.
The Japs started the damn war ! Funny, they didn't mention that
either........
They do seem to avoid certain realities. I was speaking with an
American rep from Fuji film two years ago, who mentioned that that extra
kick of blue in Fuji film, as well as the phosphors on Mitsubishi
television sets is there to keep native Japanese from looking so yellow
on camera.
And apparently they're so dishonored by their defeat that Mitsubishi
do not acknowledge, and have done everything possible to destroy
documentation for, the Zero.
They haven't forgotten the war. In a release meant only to be seen
by the eyes of Japanese captains of industry, the economic minister, in
the 70's, set out a plan whereby Japanese industry would overtake the US
and work to bankrupt, and humble the arrogant Americans in an economic
war that they (meaning we, the US) could not win.
For awhile it seemed that they would succeed. Paybacks, however,
being a bitch, saw otherwise.
That mindset, though, is still in play today, in the form of the
auto war betweenToyotaand General Motors....ironically, a microcosm of
the rivalry between Japan and the US....where if they'd join us as
allies, the potential for mutual benefit is dramatic. The alliance
betweenToyotaand GM in the 80's and 90's produced two ofToyota'smost
successful models. It also produced profits that enabledToyotato come
after GM today. And again, ironically, doing so by playing absent the
rules by which US manufacturers have to play.
You know, we rebuilt them after the war. W. Edwards Deming's (an
American) theories permitted their industry to return to strength in
less than 20 years, our own welcome mat generosity allowed them to
establish a base of operations in this country that has made Japan a
global economic power.
You'd think somewhere there might be a 'thank you.'
But noooOOOOOOoooo.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Lets See . . .
Japan and the Japanese never Apologized
to China for the Rape of Nanking.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre
Japan and the Japanese never Apologized
to the Korean 'Comfort' Women.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comfort_women
Japan and the Japanese never Apologized
for the Bataan Death March and the Inhumain
Treatment of Prisoners of War - Slave Labor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataan_Death_March
http://www.rense.com/general8/pows.htm
and the japanese say we caused it all . . .
BULL SH*T ~ RHF
******************************************
And because of that and, of course, Pearl Harbor, I have NEVER owned a
Tore-Up-Yota, Honda, Nissan,
or Mitsubishi. Yes, I know that many parts are bought and used by American
auto makers, but I cannot help that. IMHO, to buy those makes is near
treason so far as I am concerned. Its almost impossible to buy purely
American products, but I try. So I quietly make a statement by driving GMcars--particularly Chevrolet.
Some of us say, "OH! But Americancarsare no good!"
Horse hockey! I have driven MANY GMcars/trucks with a minimum of trouble
for 40 years, and some of them over 250,000 miles before succumbing to
"trading fever". A buddy of mine has an 86 Silverado with 450,000 miles on
it, replacing ONE engine and ONE tranny in 20 years. Gonna keep it, too! In
fact, the older I get, the less need I see for buying newercarsand my
latest car is a Chevy S-10 with 161,000 (so it's relatively "new"). And,
like the rest of my Americancars, I have had FEW issues with it. In fact,
the things I have replaced in the last 7 years are normal wear items--tires,
batteries, belts, an alternator, one ball joint---and the truck is 10 years
old! It has been a solid, reliable, relatively economical vehicle and,
should I replace it, it will be another pickup---probably another, newer
Chevy S-10. Heck if it breaks, I can fix it, and I STILL don't have a car
payment next month!!
So flame and criticize away. I AIN'T fergittin' and I ain't buyin no
Honda!~ :)
J
.
.
. .- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
On the other side of the coin I had a GMC pickup that was sucked at
60,000 miles and it was always maintained properly.
The rocker panels rusted out at 45,000miles,even though it was
rustproofed at the dealer ship
Also had a Ford F-150 v-8 and the front end needed a rebuild at 8000
miles and no these vehicles were never worked , strictly recreation
and everyday drivers,so that put me off NA products and I drive
NOTHING but Toyota and Honda now and dont have these early bio-
degradeable problems anymore............just normal wearout and
maintenence
And as far as buying Japanese cars is treason ?If you study the
archives in Washington D.C.you will discover that the US cut off the
oil to Japan in the far east thereby putting the Japenese backs to the
wall and forcing an attack on the US.
Ther are many hypothesis about Roosevelts actions and some say he did
this to get the US into the war to help out Great? Britain.
Otherwise the US public would NOT have approved of getting into ww11,
but Roosevelt needed something to fire up the populations anger....
thence their approval.
mred