Thread
:
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change the cell phone industry.
View Single Post
#
53
September 1st 07, 07:31 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
Don Bowey
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 286
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change thecell phone industry.
On 9/1/07 10:48 AM, in article
,
"Telamon" wrote:
In article ,
Don Bowey wrote:
On 8/26/07 7:15 PM, in article
,
"John Navas" wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:52:55 -0700, Don Bowey wrote
in :
On 8/15/07 11:07 PM, in article
,
"John Navas" wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0700, Don Bowey wrote
in :
On 7/19/07 4:42 PM, in article
,
"John Navas" wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:45:00 GMT,
wrote in
:
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium wrote:
Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and
start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less
and
a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz. In addition, the following must
also apply:
The audio bandwidth of the phone system is about 3 KHz.
Actually more like 10 KHz.
If he is commenting on the bandwidth of a message network
channel/circuit,
including cellular, it is about 3 kHz.
Audio. Suggest you read more carefully.
Audio WHAT? Read what more carefully? Are you attempting to say the audio
bandwidth of a message network channel is greater than about 3 kHz?
No. Suggest you read more carefully.
Suggest you kiss my ass.
I suggest you pay attention to the news groups to which you cross post.
Plonk
Idiot. The reply goes to whatever distribution was set on the posted
message. Plonk yourself, Troll.
Reply With Quote
Don Bowey
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Don Bowey