On Sep 3, 3:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Sep 3, 2:48 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Bart Bailey" wrote in message

...

In posted on
Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:01:33 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

People under 50 to 55 will just not listen to the quality of AM radio.

Wouldn't have anything to do with the whole dial being full of
bloviating right wing programming, would it?

The current programming is the only thing that still works on AM.

You see, what you fail to grasp is that it is not working. AM is
rapidly dying. It is losing every demographic except perhaps those who
are 50+. You really need to face facts and stop living in the past.
You sound like you're still in 1943.

I have already stated that nearly all AM audience is over 45, and a majority
over 55. That is the problem; the only fix is to broaden the appeal of AM
via HD because under-55's will listen to the existing content but will not
listen to AM quality.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, but the point obviously hasn't taken hold of you yet because you
still insist on living in the past. AM is dead, so let it go and
embrace newer technologies. I don't think you appreciate the sorry
state of AM programming today.