art wrote:

...
AETHER. Equilibrium of moving parts
means changes of the shape of the extreme borders within equilibrium
is held .When the equilibrium boundaries change
the shape of the eather also must change and eventually must be
included in an equilibrium of sorts
Art


Equilibrium is a poor choice of words when you encompasses the ether, in
my humble opinion.

You are attempting to give known states/laws/rules/properties to a
material (ether) which Einstein himself tells you NOT to--Einstein
implies a proper model for the ether was not available during his
lifetime, I do not see where that has changed, to date.

Indeed, in pure form, equilibrium implies a static state--anything more
implies an over unity condition (perpetual motion), the forces which
drive the motion and birth of stars-planets and the expanding of the
universe is/are NOT in a static state, in six billion years a static
state has not come into being, in another six billion years it is not
expected for it to come into stasis--only if this will remain true
"forever" remains a question.

As long as matter exists, the above will, seemingly, remain true. A
state of "un-equilibrium" exists in the sheer fact that all matter has
been ripped from the very fabric of the ether--this I suspect is a most
unnatural state of affairs (no one can be sure, for sure--and we only
have one example to view! Other explanations exist ... ) ... we will
know when we have "seen" the ether and know of the laws/rules which
govern it and its' un-ponder-able properties.

Regards,
JS