View Single Post
  #140   Report Post  
Old September 7th 07, 02:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Photon vs Wave emissions from antennas?

On 6 Sep, 13:14, John Smith wrote:
art wrote:

...


AETHER. Equilibrium of moving parts
means changes of the shape of the extreme borders within equilibrium
is held .When the equilibrium boundaries change
the shape of the eather also must change and eventually must be
included in an equilibrium of sorts
Art


Equilibrium is a poor choice of words when you encompasses the ether, in
my humble opinion.

You are attempting to give known states/laws/rules/properties to a
material (ether) which Einstein himself tells you NOT to--Einstein
implies a proper model for the ether was not available during his
lifetime, I do not see where that has changed, to date.

Indeed, in pure form, equilibrium implies a static state--anything more
implies an over unity condition (perpetual motion), the forces which
drive the motion and birth of stars-planets and the expanding of the
universe is/are NOT in a static state, in six billion years a static
state has not come into being, in another six billion years it is not
expected for it to come into stasis--only if this will remain true
"forever" remains a question.

As long as matter exists, the above will, seemingly, remain true. A
state of "un-equilibrium" exists in the sheer fact that all matter has
been ripped from the very fabric of the ether--this I suspect is a most
unnatural state of affairs (no one can be sure, for sure--and we only
have one example to view! Other explanations exist ... ) ... we will
know when we have "seen" the ether and know of the laws/rules which
govern it and its' un-ponder-able properties.

Regards,
JS


I believe we view aether differently as well as the term equilibrium.
The later describes what is balanced within a border and where
momement of the
interned is reacted by countermovement in the shape of the border.
This is why I keep comming back to Gauss
and his description of static particles. True the border varies in
shape exposing
cracks or deformation of its borders where particles can escape before
equilibrium
is reformed as internal forces or orbits correct their positions so
the retaining border
becomes of uniform strength again. If the innards were not mobile and
adaptive to change
then once the border was fractured it could not adapt and heal itself.
This bordcer in itself
is balanced as part of other gravitational borders all of which are
expanding and regenerating into
different border and thus expanding into the aether which has nothing
to provide resistance.
The main point is that all that is contained must have movement so
when the balanc eof equilibrium is momentarily broken
it is in a position to adapt its internal movements to attain
equilibrium again. How else can one adapt to escaping particles and
collisions
if there were not constant movementof that which holds together
because of equilibrium.
True Richard will take exception to this as he views himself as
Einsteins successor and is determined to block in his own eyes
everything
except what spills from his own mouth with the suggestion that he
knows all but has not yet decided to disclose it. The same with
respect to his credentials that allows him to judge thoughts of
others.
Art