View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 11:04 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Michael Black - So In Your 'Opinion' Posting Shortwave Listener's Radio Reception Reports are Off-Topic and "SPAM"

= = = On Sep 11, 12:38 pm,
= = = (Michael Black) wrote:
- - RHF ) writes:
- - Michael Black - So In Your 'Opinion' Posting Shortwave Listener's
- - Radio Reception Reports are Off-Topic and "SPAM"
-
- No bozo, the issue is that there's no report here.

I Think The Issue Is - You Need an Issue.

You have nothing valid to say,


One Man's In-Validity -is- Another Man's Self-Validity.

I Think
"WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC"
says a lot to the 'average' Newsgroup Reader who
Lacks your need for Exalted Posting Standards
and Meaningful Relevance.

you are merely pointing to something somewhere else.


Isn't That What Links/URLs Are For ?
- - - Why Waste the Bandwidth when a One Line Descrition
and a Link/URL will do ?

We do not need to see such junk posts on a regular basis.


? "We" ?

One Man's Junk -is- Another Man's Treasure.

If you were actually posting a reception report here, without
all that junk pointing to elsewhere, then I wouldn't say a thing.


Oh Really - Who Would You Have To Attack Then Cuhulin;
DX Ace; - I am 'sure' that You would Find Someone and Some
Cause to Attack.

A proper reception report includes far more details. Your single
line "report" wouldn't get you a QSL from any station, since
there's nothing to suggest you actually did receive it, and nothing
about signal strength or the other things that a station might
be interested in hearin about.


Thanks for Educating Me.

(I should point out that reception
reports were not merely about scoring QSL cards, at least not
in the early days. They were a means for a transmitting station
to get feedback, about the quality of their transmission and
the extent of their reception area.)


Thanks for the History Leason.

But you aren't. You're posting something
with the intent of pointing elsewhere.


And You Get To Point Your Finger.

You've decided you can fix up this newsgroup,
but you can't because you continue to blunder.


Fixing this Newsgroup is an Absurd - An Act of Madness

MB - That statement would also apply to You "Fixing" Me.

You've decided that it needs "on topic" posts, but
all you are posting is filler, nothing important in itself.


It's Important To Me -and- For Me It's Good Enough.

Like I said months ago, you've picked up the worst habits
of bad posters, and think they will fix the newsgroup.


Does this Newsgroup need Fixing ?

I'm certain by now everyone has seen your pointers
to elsewhere.


Yes I Am Sure That They Have.

There is no reason to clutter up the newsgroup
some more with what amount to empty posts.


One Man's Clutter -is- Another Man's "Hey That's Interesting"

Note that if you're advertising something, like those other
"groups", community standards allow for a pointer in the
signature.


While I may be a Nasty Net-Nazi - You are clearly the
Champion of this Newsgroups"Community Standards" :
- - - I am in awe of your presence here among us
lessor beings; such as I.

But you can't even conjure up a proper signature line.
And even then, you would need to be posting something
that adds to the existing discussion, not merely posting
so people might see your signature.


You Are So RIght - I 'feel' like a Total Failure.

I want you to live up to community standards, and that's
why I'm picking apart your posts.


I Don't Deserve You - thank you, Thank You. THANK YOU !

You are still pathalogically changing the subject headers.


You Are So RIght - I 'feel' so Pathological and Pathetic.

Start living up to community standards, including proper
formation of sentences with only the usual amount of
punctuation marks, and quoting only which you are specifically
replying to, and keeping subject headers constant, and
not posting empty posts, and quoting properly (you are
now, or maybe continue to quote badly, so it's not really
clear at what point your post starts and the bit you
are quoting ends.


yes, Yes. YES ! - My Sins Are Many.

Once you live up to those community standards, it would
be far easier to understand what you are saying. And
then we can decide whether or not you have any value
here or not.


? 'we' ? - I 'feel' so Value-Less.

And finally, if everyone is ignoring you, then what's the
point of posting your junk?


Alas - I Post For Only - me, Me. ME !

Michael


MB,

Remember - You Are Talking To and Arguing With A "Bozo"
- - - Consider the Possibilities and Permutations . . .

~ RHF