On Sep 15, 11:39 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...



Well, I suppose there's no COMMERCIAL service of any kind unless
there's profit made. Come to think of it, this is precisely the lesson
AM HD broadcasters are about to learn....the hard way.

Since there are literally only a handful of non-commercial AMs, this
discussion has to be about commercial radio.

This is incorrect. The fact that there are currently only a handful of
non-commercial AMs does not entail that there could not be a greater
number of non-commercial AMs. To discuss not only what AM is but the
ways in which it could change in the future is perfectly legitimate.
This is precisely the problem with you and the other proponents of AM
HD: instead of looking to the future, you instead look to the past.


By the way, while you were posting here, more of your listeners
expired. Guess the colloidal silver didn't reach 'em in time.

"My" listeners have a median age of about 33. None of them are expiring from
old age.

You obviously don't understand the meaning of "median".