John Smith wrote:
Richard Fry wrote:

___________

All I find from you there is more paragraphs of your beliefs -- nothing
in the way of mathematical proof.

RF


"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." --Albert Einstein


So whose facts do I use to build my antenna?

Do I use facts that I have already used to build operable antennas that
function as claimed, or do I use facts that to my knowledge have not
ever been used build an antenna, but facts that only make for almost
impossible to read text in a Usenet group?

It doesn't define one as close minded to note that extraordinary claims
require proof at the same level.

wouldn't simple proof be a lot easier than declaring all who disagree as
enemies of one sort or another?

Build one of those bad boys, put it on an antenna range, test it out and
let the decibels fall where they may. All else is just netnews s/n.

Proof would shut us close minded ones up would it not? Then the antenna
will become status quo, and we will rush to defend it.


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -