On 24 Sep, 11:23, Michael Coslo wrote:
art wrote:
On 24 Sep, 10:04, Michael Coslo wrote:
John Smith wrote:
Richard Fry wrote:
___________
All I find from you there is more paragraphs of your beliefs -- nothing
in the way of mathematical proof.
RF
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." --Albert Einstein
So whose facts do I use to build my antenna?

Do I use facts that I have already used to build operable antennas that
function as claimed, or do I use facts that to my knowledge have not
ever been used build an antenna,

SNIP
I would go with that one if I were you so you keep apace of your
knoweledge level.

Sheesh, Art. How come every one who questions you is some kind of
dullard, or worse? Even those who aren't questioning you, such as
myself. Your antenna might be the best thing since sliced bread, but I'm
not saying it isn't, I'm saying show me.

It must be an interesting world where only those who agree with you are
intelligent or clever, and all those who have the temerity to even ask
questions, wanting proof, are not.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear Michael from the past I was called every name under the sun on
past patents
This time I gave the basis of the mathematics, I gave a array of full
wave
elements that was checked independently on this newsnet. I also put
up a page
with the data and drawings from a static field ala Gauss on to a
dynamic form
where it can be verivied by computor programs.
All I got was jeers and insults there is nothing more that I can do
other what I have done
I can't make you make one even with instructions and I am not giving
out gifts.
Oh and you got the benefit of Dr Davis's mathematical analysis to boot
before the group dissed him to.
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....XG