Thread: Maxwells laws
View Single Post
  #41   Report Post  
Old September 24th 07, 11:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected] nm5k@wt.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Maxwells laws

On Sep 24, 4:52 pm, art wrote:

Art goes the other route. He talks a great storm, but nothing is
ever produced to actually test in the real world.
As far as I see it, that is no way to live.
MK


I have built them no problem but I am not going to give them away to
people who arenot interested in them.


They do make cameras... You can take one to a test range
and post the results.

It is no problem to me if you don't make one.


Thats good, cuz I prefer full size antennas...

Listen out for me when
it gets cold on 160 meters. I have a rotatable one about 2 foot square
that will be on the tower but at the moment I am adding to it to make
it an all bander maybe all frequency with two rotators for horizontal
and vertical radiation. But then if you can't hear me then you can't
work me.


If you put out a decent signal, I should hear you.
I'll be out in the country using big antennas.
Heck, I already have a full size 160m dipole up there.
I was there Sept 1... I converted my old 80/40 dipoles
to add two more bands. Now I have 160,80,40,20 dipoles
on a single feedline. I eventually plan some type of
vertical for transmitting. Probably a wire running up a
tall tree. And yes, I'll be using a few of those obsolete
old radials to ensure the ground losses don't eat my
lunch.
And as you have probably already noticed, I have plans for
beverages up there. I'll have a big small loop too..
If you operate, and put out any kind of decent signal,
I should be able to hear you with little trouble.

By the way large ground planes are not in vogue anymore since they
have lost their uses.


What? Ground loss has finally been done away with?
It's xmas in Sept... :/

No I anm not going to bring it to you so that
you can see the test or operate it so you will have to continue to
call me names as usual


As usual, you are not much help. BTW, I don't really recall calling
*you* any names. Only your posted "theory"... :/

By the way John E Davis works is still in the archives, he has not
removed it for people trying to find it.


I don't need to find it. I was here when it all went down.
As I recall, Richard asked him a few pertinent questions, and
he did a runner..
Myself, I think once he finally got a clue what you were proposing,
he decided to duck and cover his rear.. I know he has not been
back to answer the fairly simple questions posed to him.
BTW, if you do decide to get out on 160m to test this antenna,
please do us all a favor and ensure that the feedline is not doing
the bulk of the radiating.
I'll be going back up there in middle-late Oct when the trees
start turning colorful if you want to try it out.
MK