On Oct 8, 2:37 pm, dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...

Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It hadn't occurred to me, but I'll bet his colleagues would be plenty
surprised by the lies he's told here. My guess is that he's more
careful in his life "offline", but people like this always forget how
easily the line between on and offline gets crossed. Sooner or later
this kind of crap will catch up with him. Like I said, though, I'll
bet that he can tolerate embarrassment much better than most people
because even embarrassment is a source of what he needs more than
anything: attention. Maybe this is a good thing...hard to say. Trying
to distinguish good from bad scenarios is pretty meaningless in this
context.