October 12th 07, 12:48 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
|
|
New antenna
On 11 Oct, 11:12, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"Gene Fuller" wrote in message
...
art wrote:
On 9 Oct, 19:35, John Smith wrote:
art wrote:
www.newswise.com/articles/view/532935
Yeah, ole' Robert Vincent is a sore spot in the NG, I'd imagine. Made
A$$'es out of all the "experts" and continues to do so ... sometimes
there is real justice.
Regards,
JS
Yup, the experts were not experts after all just phony's.
Ofcourse we now have to wait for comments like " I knew that all the
time",
"I have been using that method for years", "that was invented by
Mantovani
a hundred yeard ago but he just didn't get around to printing it"
Art
The patent, US 7187335, is a real hoot. I especially like the part where
he describes doubling the bandwidth by adding a parasitic winding
intertwined with the base coil helix.
Do you suppose his antenna is in equilibrium? Could proper application of
Artsian-Gaussian theory improve it even more?
73,
Gene
W4SZ
Hi Gene, From the data posted by Vincent I dont think he is trying to be a
fraud. Maybe he is just unaware that the data he is discovering about short
antennas is about 70 or 80 years old. That would be giving him the benifit
of the doubt.
Jimmie- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well said
Art
|