Thread: New antenna
View Single Post
  #55   Report Post  
Old October 20th 07, 09:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John Smith John Smith is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default New antenna

Richard Fry wrote:

...

The fundamentals of EM radiation are defined by natural laws, which even
50 years ago were rather well understood.

New antenna designs always will be possible, but all of them of
necessity must be based on, and follow natural law.

RF


Sheer insanity and babbly-cockery!

Current "natural laws", and especially as defined by math, allows for a
377 ohm impedance to be given "nothing" (or, the ether--and indeed,
there does appear to be some "property" responsible for it--just not the
one presently given.)

Allows for a permittivity to be assigned to "nothing", actually the ether.

Allows for a permeability to be assigned to "nothing", actually, again,
the ether.

Allows for the spinning of the earth and motion of our solar system to
be involved in the equations/math of our antenna/rf calculations.

Nothing should be allowed to be logical, and, therefore, simply
"NOTHING!" And, therefore unable to have any qualities, properties,
effects, affects, laws, etc.

Until the above is accounted for and sorted into a logical theorem,
present "antenna science" looks as if a bunch of African witch doctors
are implementing it!

Admittedly, some progress is being made, however, little of that ever
sees the light of day here ...

Regards,
JS