View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old October 27th 07, 02:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected] nm5k@wt.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST

On Oct 26, 1:20 pm, Michael Coslo wrote:


I've considered putting a tuner on my Bugcatcher for 80 meters, but
haven't. The thing is so narrow there that the alternative is two taps
for the phone portion of the band.


That would more more for impedance matching rather than the
loading coil itself. I have no real problem with that. I've often used
simple L network tuners for matching mobile antennas.
The system I have a problem with is using the tuner as the
loading coil itself. It's usually a disaster as far as efficiency.
Maximum current is at the coil, and often that coil will be
surrounded by body metal. Not good.. Poor current distribution
through the whip, and low overall efficiency. Not good..
If they left out bugcatchers in the test, no wonder all those
tuner fed things looked so good...
If your antenna acts very "high Q", that's actually good.
It means it's probably a pretty decent radiator.
I'd be more worried if it acted overly broadbanded, or low Q.
You won't lose much if you use a tuner for Z matching in your
case.
MK