On 29 Oct, 04:56, Cecil Moore wrote:
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
This is where I plateau in terms of
physics comprehension; I am not able to tell the difference between a wave
and a particle, understanding as well that there may be none.

If you test expecting to find a wave, you will.
If you test expecting to find a particle, you will. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil
The Masters did not have computors so they tried deduction removing
all that did not meet empirical or mathematical tests before they
expoused them to the World.
In this case they meet empirical tests, they meet mathematical tests,
they abide by Maxwells laws and for those who demand more get an
optimiser computor program and without tying it to a planar mode the
antenna program will come back automatically with a non planar mode of
radiator, a radiator of any size or shape or elevation that is in a
state of equilibrium in singular or group form. The Masters found that
when working along side nature you have to walk in natures shoes but
never, never mess with mother nature.
Cecil, people have stopped calling me a blithering idiot! Are they
beginning to think that on this newsgroup I operate under a psuedo
name then who am I? Should we test QST and ask them to publish this
instead of mobile antenna guff? Where is the person who can clinically
disembowel this model and what University does he teach in? Is the
World correct in allowing computors to machinate the numbers
mathematically first and then allowing scientists to collect those
that look O.K. and then play with them, or did the Masters have the
right idea of turning that approach around for gaining advances?
Your friend
Art