On 29 Oct, 20:00, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

oups.com...

On 28 Oct, 20:03, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
Please take note that Maxwells equations verify this model
I suggest you look up in the archives my research on Gauss
since you are new to the group before you next want to invalidate
Maxwell!!
Regards
Art

Art, I am not certain *physically* as to what happens when the RF energy,
stored as AC discreet electrons in your tank circuit, is converted to the RF
wave/photon energy in the EM wave emitted from your antenna. Maxwell
describes "what" happens, not physically "how" it happens. You claim to
describe physically "how" it happens and claim that your theory does not
disagree with Maxwell. I can say that a supreme being from Xenu causes a
rock to fall when I drop it from a cliff and that may not conflict with
Newton. But the emission of electrons from any antenna of whatever magnetic
properties, assuming it is even a conductor, does not meet basic science
unless you are referring to corona which we are not. You have probably read
that one can even construct a crude transmitter by rubbing a ping-pong ball
on a carpet to induce a static charge on it and then move the resulting
E-field it up and down. In that case we have a non-magnetic/non-metallic
antenna producing an ELF EM radiowave of about 30 millions meters in
wavelength. I do know that EM waves are composed of fields, not discreet
electrons moving in space (whether we describe the phenomenon in terms of
waves or photons). In response to your post, Maxwells equations are all
about *fields*. These EM fields move at the speed of light. Electrons do not
move at c. They cannot; it is physically improssible as you know. The
electrons involved in creating the EM field are hardly even displaced along
the length/surface of your antenna. I submit that, when your equipment
generates an EM wave, the finite number of electrons that your tank
circuit can hold, although extremely high, can in no way begin to approach
the infinite number of receiving "antennas" (much less the number of
"electrons" they could each "receive") in the whole universe that can and do
receive your signal.

You have said a lot but it appears that for what ever reason you
reject what I submit.
So I give you one morsel to ponder upon. When you apply a time vary
field to a gaussian
static field the result is an equation that matches Maxwell( read
archives for the discussion on that)
Since static particles are in no way in planar form but it still
conforms to Maxwell
one should be able to insert into a antenna computor program with an
optimiser a radiator of some length
at an angle to the earths surface and ask for max vertical or
horizontal gain.
I did that and gave the optimizer response to this group for
verification by any computor program
they want to use. It was verified using NEC 4 and is in the archives.
So disregarding any "how radiation works" I will leave you and anybody
else to explain
1 When a time varying field is applied to a static field the resultant
equation is the same as Maxwells
2 when a non planar radiator as in a static field is inserted in a
program based on Maxwell's laws
it produces a result that is not planar and verified by other antenna
programs.
I welcome any response that explains why such a thing could happen
using established theory.
Forget the hand waving and address those two basic statements in a
scietific manner.
For starters, all of this group stated that you cannot add time to
both sides of the static
equation which put them all in opposition to anything that followed,
despite intervention
from a Doctor at MIT showing that I was correct in detailed
mathematical form
Why? Well it is just because...........no reasons given, just
because.
Your move
Art Unwin KB9MZ.....XG