On 3 Nov, 05:41, Cecil Moore wrote:
H. Adam Stevens wrote:
I would love to have coherent photons at HF.

The feedpoint impedance of a standing-wave antenna (like a
dipole) is (Vfor+Vref)/(Ifor+Iref). Since the Z0 of a dipole
wire is in the ballpark of 600 ohms, the interference that
results in a feedpoint impedance of 72 ohms proves the
photons are coherent.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
Gentlemen
You guys are really screwed up with respect to radiation
A radiator has three components, capacitance, inductance and
resistance
where Maxwell states thatthe RC ratio is a constant for the material
and frequency.
All of these three components store energy in diffent forms. Now the
capacitor
stores static energy via static electrons and there is no getting away
from that.
Maxwells laws state that the LC ratio must be kept for the model used
and we
know that the expellation of energy with velocity is only by the
capacitor
and the inductance acting asd a tank circuit. We also know that a
diagmagnet
material is a radiator that has bound electrons in orbit around the
atom but it is also
one of the few materials that allow free static electons to rest upon
its surface.
Now you take it from there. A wavelength radiator with free electons
resting on its surface
and subject to two high velocity energy release explosions per one
cycle.
Now where in the heck do "protons"come into play when we are forcing
static
electrons off of the surface of a radiator by overcoming its inertia?

Another point Using Gauss's law of statics we use only static
particles in a field.
There is no reason why we cannot add to the field a resonant length of
a radiator
as long as it doesn't upset the equilibrium inside the field.
(This arbitary border system is used widely in many areas of
matematics)
You can then add to the model a time varying factor which duplicates
Maxwell's equations and solve by a Maxwell derived computor program
which
allows one to deduce that a radiator can be any shape or size or
configuration
as long as it is in equilibrium inside
the Gaussian field.
Again we see a instance of radiation where the static particle or
electron
is the main subject of radiation. Again no reference to protons!
Look up google regarding atomic explosions where it is stated that
electrons
impinged on the Hawii electrical system and crashed it. Electrons
were
ejected thru the atmosphere, again with no mention of protons.
Why O why do hams try to make things difficult? I defy anybody
to finding things to the contrary with respect to mathematics
other than just hand waving so what is ham radios problem?
Art Unwin.....KB9MZ...XG