On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:33:10 -0800, art wrote:

Words don't trump mathematics

And yet you haven't produced a lick of equations, or solutions.

Do you still maintain
mass and bluffing shows the error of
Rr = 80 · pi² · (length/wavelength)²
?

You asked for a simple, one-sentence equation you could prove wrong
with mathematics. Feel free to fill in the variables and show how the
solution is wrong. [Hint: the same formula can even be found in a
book you own, page 12 of chapter 2, of J&J, if you haven't colored
over it on the page.]

Note, that if you prove this wrong by your mathematics as you said you
would, you simultaneously impeach your only reference book that you
have used to prove your theory. Quite a paradox isn't it? I don't
think Johnson and Jasik ever show that mass and bluffing like yours
proves the error of their own work.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC