On 8 Nov, 11:37, "Richard Fry" wrote:
"art" wrote No. I asked a question as to how that can be To which I later
theorised etc etc

___________

That was an interesting read. I suggest you send your work to the
IEEE to see what they make of it. If it all goes your way, you will
have earned parity with all the "masters" you refer to so frequently.

RF

That cannot be done. There are legitimate guru's on this net
and very near the top I would put Richard despite his arrogance,
jeering and painfull use of english.
But the fact is that those endowed with a knoweledge of radiation
have been bitten so many times by wishfull thinking of new antennas
that they have wandered firmly into the camp that all is known
and now dismiss all without the thought aplied that they are capable
of
I first started talk of radiation occurring in pulsatic form
on this forum many years ago when I first applied myself to the
science of antennas. This mere notion of mine started off this
adventure
where every adjective is being used to describe me.
However as somebody who came from the docklands of East Londonyou
are given the natural ability of sticking to your guns regardless
of what it does to your self esteem. I suspect I will go to my grave
before my work is taken seriously. And that is a shame. Not for me
but for the continuance of ham radio where we can again convince all
that ham radio is still at the cusp of new discoveries and have a
useful purpose in society. I am not asking for recognition of any sort
since as a former cockney I can handle adversity regardless how it is
formed
I can take it and I surely can give it out.( I remember Goring and his
bombers)
Regards
Art KB9MZ...XG (uk)