On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 02:21:08 -0500, "AI4QJ" wrote:

The phase is changed, resulting in 62.5 nsec delay with respect to
voltage but the current and voltage both travel at approx. c. This cannot be
changed. It is basic physics and I agree, it is not a "real" math problem,
just fundamental common knowledge. Furthermore, the standing wave is created
by reflections. In this case, fields generated by lentz's law are
effectively cancelled out so the delay is not longer present. The value of
62.5nsec is in the same order of magnitude as Cecil's values and it is
common to arrive at the same result using different means; they tend to
confirm that each is correct (like checking a proof as in QED).

Hi Dan,

As to Quod Erat Demonstrandum, I seriously doubt you two are
demonstrandum the same thing.

You haven't been following the argument so much as the math - they are
not the same thing.

This is not a math problem.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC