I've always regarded email as being private and confidential, and I'm
sorry to see that Cecil doesn't give it the same respect. My email to
Cecil was correctly quoted. However, as so often seems to happen, the
context wasn't accurately reported. I provide support for all EZNEC
customers, including Cecil, as I always have. And I choose not to engage
Cecil in pointless and endless argument about his alternative theories,
either in this newsgroup or by email.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Sal M. Onella wrote:
"-------------" ---------------.com wrote in message
. net...
-----------------wrote:
But if anyone is
actually seriously interested in investigating alternative theories or
analytical methods, NEC or derivative programs such as EZNEC can provide
powerful assistance in confirming or refuting them.
Here is an email response from -------------, when I used
EZNEC to disprove his invalid coil current measurements.
He apparently didn't like the EZNEC results from this file:

http://www.-------------/coil512.EZ

---------------------wrote on May 12, 2007:
I resent your trying to use EZNEC support as a surreptitious
way to continue pushing your junk science on me. If you send
me one more non-support related email, I'll put you on my spam
list so your messages won't even make it to my ISP and I won't
have to waste any more of my time on you. That'll mean no more
EZNEC support, and I'll refund your EZNEC purchase price. So go
ahead, send me one more non-support email and make an easy $149.00.
----- previously posted my private email without my permission
so turn about is fair play.
--
73, ------ http://www.---------.com

Well, well, well! Two men who would otherwise be generating admiration are
in a hair-salon slap fight. Nobody cares but I'm putting this group on
hiatus. Phooey!