On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:32:51 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

the 21st response.

No contrary evidence noted.

For the Nth time...
This represents the expected cries of anguish more than correspondence
to the immediate topic with N greater than the 20th question where
formerly Cecil was loath to proceed beyond...

As observed earlier, threads driven by data rarely present the
entertainment that enthralls many to submit upwards to 500 postings.

I see no further data regarding the topic is forthcoming, an expected
outcome, but certainly not Cecil's best option. However, Cecil is the
only one that can fill in the blanks of a measurement that appears
never to have been made. There appear to have been no witnesses that
can independantly supply that data either. As such, nothing is left
to be said that negates my conclusions set forth in this thread as
were drawn from the only data available.

Of course, Cecil could impeach his own data. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC