View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 6th 03, 04:08 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 05 Nov 2003 21:28:06 GMT, oSaddam (Yuri Blanarovich)
wrote:

Why don't you guys that know pitfalls of measurement do it and report ?????
Hello????

Hi Yuri,

As this is your party, the burden of proof is upon you. I supplied
you with a litany of trip-points and you in fact responded to none.
If we await and find breathlessly announced results achieved by
obviously problematic means followed by universal HO-HUMs, is it MY
fault?

This coil stuff is trivial in
comparison.


You may not be dumb, you may have been awarded up the gumpstump, you
may have done testing, but nothing is trivial or everything is
trivial. In other words, why all the sturm und drang if there's
nothing to it? Announcing things like this being trivial, in the
spin-meistering of the political hacks, is lowering the bar and
reducing expectations so that mediocre work glows in comparison.

Obtaining precision and accuracy is not daunting, it is not beyond the
reach of ordinary means, it simply takes planning. Too many here
backfill that lack with cut-and-paste philosophy.

Yuri, you came here to buff up your position to counter Tom's
criticism. You asked for input, and instead you seem to be fishing
for praise. What's the program? Respond to the technical points or
insert [applause here] in your posts.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC