On Dec 7, 4:10 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
Sounds good, but mostly you do not examine
ideal conditions because they tend to show that
the models fail.

I believe that is a false statement. Please
prove your assertion.

The best example was when you refused to discuss
the reflections at the output of an amplifier with a
well defined output impedance because a typical
amateur transmitter does not have a well defined
output impedance.

The discussion was going to demolish the idea of
complete re-reflection at the output of a transmitter
but stalled because you refused to use the simple
case to examine the issue. Using the more
complicated scenario of a real transmitter it was
much easier to obfuscate with the result that the
discussion went nowhere.

Which was sad because there was much
opportunity for learning there.

....Keith