On Dec 8, 12:52 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
The best example was when you refused to discuss
the reflections at the output of an amplifier with a
well defined output impedance because a typical
amateur transmitter does not have a well defined
output impedance.

I tend to avoid discussions about amplifiers because
I know very little about amplifiers, real or imagined.

Serious revisionism here.

You should count your posts on (re)reflections at the
output terminals of amplifiers.

....Keith