Richard Clark wrote:
"AI4QJ" wrote:
standing wave currents

When these three keywords are braced with quotes, Google reveals all
of 19, non-duplicated sources.

When the keywords, "current in standing waves", is used
Google comes up with 294,000 hits.

Cecil's
reconstructed, but revisionist measurement that disputes Tom's data
published on the web; it was nearly identical to Tom's when phases
were reconciled in his test arrangement.

This is absolutely not true. One wonders what you have
to gain by falsifying technical data. One wonders why
you have not responded to my request to explain the
"Load Dat" results of http://www.w5dxp.com/coil512.ex
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com