Cecil Moore wrote:

Ian, I apologize for yanking your chain. It is a bad
habit of mine.

Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Yep, that's exactly as I quoted it.

Once could have been a mistake. Twice is deliberate, dishonest
manipulation.

Ian, your first sentence was false and I responded to it.
No amount of words that you post after the first false
statement will make it true. There *are* glitches in the
standard circuit models for inductance and capacitance
because they do not agree with Maxwell's equations.
There was nothing dishonest about my replies. In fact,
I was just following netnews rules.

Continuing: If your model worked, W8JI would not have
measured a 3ns delay on 4 MHz through a 2" dia, 100 T,
10" long coil. It is, in fact, your flawed model that
allowed him to come to the false conclusions that he
did. And I notice your model got you in trouble because
you did not offer one word of objection to his obviously
impossible conclusions.

You guys are religiously addicted to models that do
not correspond to reality and it gets you into a lot
of trouble including passing false information along
to your naive readers.

It appears that we are on the verge of proving that a
3 ns delay through the above coil is impossible no
matter what your model says.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com