On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:40:43 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Cecil's
reconstructed, but revisionist measurement that disputes Tom's data
published on the web; it was nearly identical to Tom's when phases
were reconciled in his test arrangement.

This is absolutely not true.

This is merely the hysterical reaction to personal embarassment.

One wonders what you have
to gain by falsifying technical data.

The data was wholly of your own supply. As I pointed out, the obvious
conclusion you reject in my quote above could only be satisfied by
your impeaching your own data. ;-)

One wonders why
you have not responded to my request to explain the
"Load Dat" results of http://www.w5dxp.com/coil512.ex

"One" is the keyword and luckily it is only "one." If other's pressed
me, I might be motivated, but you don't have that capacity.

Count yourself lucky to have mooched the validation you have from the
few who haven't been around the block with you.